A professor wishes to adapt their course policy to mitigate AI misconduct while still acknowledging its utility. Which of the following pedagogical strategies align with this goal? (Select all that apply.)
Correct Answers:
- Requiring students to include an “AI Use Statement” with their final submissions, detailing which tools they used and for what purpose.
- Developing a tiered syllabus policy that explicitly defines which tasks are “AI-permissible,” “AI-cited,” and “AI-prohibited.”
An effective AI policy should balance academic integrity with the practical reality that AI tools are becoming part of modern education and professional work. Rather than banning AI outright, educators can establish clear expectations for responsible use.
AI Use Statements
Requiring students to submit an AI Use Statement promotes transparency and accountability. Students disclose how AI tools contributed to their work, helping instructors distinguish between appropriate assistance and academic misconduct.
Tiered AI Policies
A tiered syllabus policy provides clear guidance by identifying:
AI-Permissible: Tasks where AI use is fully allowed.
AI-Cited: Tasks where AI assistance is permitted but must be disclosed or cited.
AI-Prohibited: Tasks that students must complete independently.
This approach reduces confusion and helps students understand acceptable practices across different assignments.
The most effective approach combines clear AI usage guidelines with student transparency. AI Use Statements and tiered syllabus policies help maintain academic integrity while recognizing the legitimate educational value of AI tools.