Table of Contents
Why Is an Unbiased Problem Statement Crucial for DMAIC Root Cause Analysis?
Learn why a well-crafted Six Sigma problem statement must focus purely on the issue, not potential solutions. Understand how this discipline prevents confirmation bias and ensures a thorough, unbiased root cause analysis in the DMAIC framework.
Question
Why should the problem statement avoid mentioning solutions?
A. It prevents customer involvement
B. It ensures unbiased analysis of root causes later
C. It increases project costs
D. It confuses the team with multiple details
Answer
B. It ensures unbiased analysis of root causes later
Explanation
Solutions come after analysis, not in the problem statement.
The Danger of Preconceived Solutions
Including a solution in a problem statement fundamentally undermines the data-driven principles of the Six Sigma methodology. The primary reason to strictly define the problem without suggesting a fix is to prevent confirmation bias. If a solution is proposed upfront, the project team will naturally tend to seek out data that supports the proposed solution while ignoring evidence that points to different root causes. This defeats the purpose of the DMAIC (Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, Control) process.
Protecting the Integrity of the DMAIC Process
The Six Sigma framework is structured to ensure that decisions are based on evidence, not assumptions.
- Define Phase: The goal is to articulate the problem, its scope, and its impact on the business and customer. The problem statement should be a factual description of the current state (the “pain”).
- Analyze Phase: This phase is dedicated to using data to identify, validate, and prioritize the true root causes of the problem defined in the first phase.
- Improve Phase: Only after the root causes are confirmed does the team move to brainstorming, evaluating, and implementing solutions that directly address those causes.
By jumping to a solution in the problem statement, a team effectively skips the critical Analyze phase. This often leads to implementing a “solution” that fails to solve the underlying problem, resulting in wasted time, money, and resources, while the original issue persists. A proper problem statement focuses on the “what” and “where” of the issue, leaving the “why” for the Analyze phase and the “how” for the Improve phase.
Why Other Options Are Incorrect
A. It prevents customer involvement: This is false. A good problem statement often incorporates the Voice of the Customer (VoC) to define the problem’s impact.
C. It increases project costs: The opposite is true. Implementing a solution for an unverified cause is what increases costs when the fix fails.
D. It confuses the team with multiple details: The primary issue is not confusion but the introduction of a critical bias that derails the entire problem-solving methodology.
Lean Six Sigma Green Belt: Apply & Master Skills certification exam assessment practice question and answer (Q&A) dump including multiple choice questions (MCQ) and objective type questions, with detail explanation and reference available free, helpful to pass the Lean Six Sigma Green Belt: Apply & Master Skills exam and earn Lean Six Sigma Green Belt: Apply & Master Skills certificate.