Table of Contents
- Why Are Users Still Frustrated with Microsoft's 'Improved' New Outlook Client?
- What Microsoft Is Actually Promising
- Core Feature Additions
- Copilot Integration
- Shared Mailbox Improvements
- The Offline and PST File Situation
- Offline Capabilities
- PST File Support
- What Users Are Actually Experiencing
- Performance Problems
- Storage Cost Concerns
- Missing Features
- Microsoft's Migration Strategy
- Timeline Considerations
- My Assessment of This Transition
Why Are Users Still Frustrated with Microsoft's 'Improved' New Outlook Client?
Microsoft has been pushing their new Outlook for Windows 11 hard. I've been watching this transition closely, and I need to tell you what's really happening with this software change.
The tech giant recently published a community post explaining why users should embrace the new Outlook client. They claim it's drastically improved over recent months, but let me break down what this actually means for you.
What Microsoft Is Actually Promising
Microsoft built the new Outlook on top of outlook.com's foundation. They're positioning it as more "agile, consistent, and manageable" than the classic version we've used for years.
The company highlights several key improvements they've made:
Core Feature Additions
- Pin important emails to stay organized
- Tabbed search functionality for finding people, files, and Teams messages
- Support for up to 21 time zones in meetings
- Colored mailbox folders and new themes
- Scheduled mail sending capabilities
Copilot Integration
Microsoft is heavily promoting their AI assistant features. The new Outlook includes Copilot capabilities like email summarization, priority inbox sorting, and draft assistance. They're adding these AI features monthly, which the classic version won't receive.
One area where Microsoft has listened to user feedback involves shared mailboxes. The new version now supports adding shared mailboxes as separate accounts, provides a "Shared with me" page for permission management, and offers better visual distinction between personal and shared folders.
The Offline and PST File Situation
Two major concerns have been offline functionality and PST file support. Microsoft acknowledges these were deal-breakers for many users.
Offline Capabilities
The new Outlook now supports basic offline functions like reading emails, composing messages, and booting without internet. Recent additions include offline search, attachment opening, and calendar event management.
PST File Support
This has been a huge sticking point. Microsoft is gradually rolling out PST capabilities including reply and forwarding from PST files, adding PST folders to favorites, and drag-and-drop functionality between PST and regular mailboxes. Full PST export capabilities are in targeted release, with importing features coming later this year.
What Users Are Actually Experiencing
The reality check comes from actual user feedback. Despite Microsoft's promotional efforts, users are reporting significant issues:
Performance Problems
Many users notice the new Outlook consumes considerably more memory than the classic version. This impacts system performance, especially on older hardware.
Storage Cost Concerns
Since everything moves to Microsoft's cloud infrastructure, organizations face increased storage costs. This wasn't an issue with locally-stored classic Outlook data.
Missing Features
Critical functionality remains absent from the new version. COM add-in support is completely gone and won't return. Microsoft claims web add-ins can replace these, but many business-critical tools still depend on COM add-ins.
The feature gap includes:
- Limited customization options
- Reduced ribbon functionality
- Missing POP3 account support
- Incomplete S/MIME implementation
Microsoft's Migration Strategy
Microsoft isn't forcing an immediate switch. Classic Outlook will receive support until at least 2029 for some users, giving organizations time to transition.
The company reports that large organizations have achieved over 50% migration rates to the new Outlook. They're encouraging side-by-side usage during the transition period, allowing users to toggle between versions as needed.
Timeline Considerations
- New features primarily go to the new Outlook
- Classic Outlook gets basic security updates only
- Full feature parity isn't expected until late 2025 or beyond
My Assessment of This Transition
Microsoft is clearly positioning the new Outlook as their future email platform. The integration with Teams, Copilot AI features, and modern web-based architecture represents their vision for workplace communication.
However, the transition feels premature for many business users. Critical features remain missing, performance issues persist, and the total cost of ownership may increase significantly.
If you're considering the switch, I recommend:
- Testing the new version alongside classic Outlook
- Identifying which features your workflow absolutely requires
- Calculating potential cloud storage cost increases
- Planning for add-in compatibility issues
The new Outlook shows promise, but Microsoft still has work to do before it truly replaces the classic version's functionality. The choice between embracing it now or waiting depends on your specific needs and tolerance for missing features.