Learn how to spot unwanted bias in AI-generated promotion candidate lists. Discover the key indicators of systematic advantage or disadvantage for certain groups.
Table of Contents
Question
When looking at a list of promotion candidates generated by an AI system, which of the following might be an indicator that there is unwanted bias in the system?
Select the two that apply.
A. All groups are represented proportionally.
B. All groups are represented equally.
C. A group receives a systematic advantage.
D. A group receives a systematic disadvantage.
Answer
When examining a list of promotion candidates generated by an AI system, two key indicators might suggest the presence of unwanted bias in the system:
C. A group receives a systematic advantage.
D. A group receives a systematic disadvantage.
Explanation
Privileged groups are those that have traditionally received more favorable outcomes than others. When this is seen in AI systems, it indicates that unwanted bias has crept in. Unwanted bias gives unfair advantages to one group over another.
These indicators suggest that the AI system may not be treating all groups fairly, which could lead to biased outcomes in the promotion process. Proportional or equal representation alone does not necessarily imply fairness if the underlying processes systematically favor or disfavor certain groups.
If certain groups consistently receive either a systematic advantage or disadvantage in the AI-generated promotion candidate lists, it is a strong indication that bias exists within the system. This means that the AI model may be favoring or discriminating against specific groups based on factors such as race, gender, age, or other protected characteristics.
On the other hand, options A and B are not necessarily indicators of bias:
A. All groups are represented proportionally.
Proportional representation of different groups in the promotion candidate list does not guarantee the absence of bias. The AI model could still be applying biased criteria in its selection process, even if the final list appears proportionally representative.
B. All groups are represented equally.
Equal representation of groups in the promotion candidate list is also not a foolproof indicator of an unbiased system. The AI model may be artificially enforcing equal representation without considering individual merit or qualifications, which can still result in biased outcomes.
To identify and mitigate unwanted bias in AI systems, it is crucial to:
- Regularly audit and analyze the AI model’s outputs for potential biases.
- Ensure that the training data used to develop the AI model is diverse, inclusive, and representative of the population.
- Implement fairness metrics and constraints during the model training process to minimize bias.
- Continuously monitor and update the AI system to address any biases that may emerge over time.
By being vigilant and proactively addressing bias in AI systems, organizations can create more equitable and unbiased promotion processes, fostering a diverse and inclusive workplace.
IBM Artificial Intelligence Fundamentals certification exam practice question and answer (Q&A) dump with detail explanation and reference available free, helpful to pass the Artificial Intelligence Fundamentals graded quizzes and final assessments, earn IBM Artificial Intelligence Fundamentals digital credential and badge.