Learn how a security analyst should respond to a suspected attack on an IoT HVAC system in a multinational corporation to protect against backdoor access.
Table of Contents
Question
A security analyst identifies an influx of network traffic from an IoT HVAC system in a multinational corporation. The corporation is concerned about a possible HVAC attack. What should the security analyst prioritize to mitigate this potential threat?
A. Investigate a possible BlueBorne attack on the IoT devices
B. Inspect the IoT HVAC system for backdoor access
C. Validate the IoT HVAC system for a potential DDoS attack
D. Check for signs of a Rolling Code attack on the IoT HVAC system
Answer
B. Inspect the IoT HVAC system for backdoor access
Explanation
In this scenario, the security analyst has identified suspicious network traffic originating from an IoT HVAC (heating, ventilation, and air conditioning) system in a large multinational company. Given the critical nature of HVAC systems and the potential for them to be compromised and used as an attack vector, the analyst needs to prioritize investigating this threat.
The best course of action is B: Inspect the IoT HVAC system for backdoor access.
Here’s why:
- IoT devices like HVAC systems often have weaker security than traditional IT systems. They may use default passwords, have unpatched vulnerabilities, or lack robust access controls. This makes them prime targets for attackers looking to gain a foothold in the network.
- If an attacker has compromised the HVAC system, they likely planted a backdoor to maintain access. A backdoor provides the attacker with a covert way to access the system remotely, steal data, laterally move to other systems, or launch additional attacks.
- Backdoors can be difficult to detect since they are designed to evade security monitoring. A thorough inspection of the HVAC system’s software, firmware, configurations, and network communications is needed to identify any suspicious code, accounts, open ports, etc. that could indicate a backdoor.
- While a DDoS attack (choice C) or Rolling Code attack (choice D) are possible, an influx of traffic from the HVAC system is more likely to indicate command-and-control communications with an attacker than a DDoS attack being launched from the HVAC system itself. And Rolling Code attacks are more relevant to car key fobs than HVAC systems.
- A BlueBorne attack (choice A) is an attack via Bluetooth vulnerabilities. But the question stem doesn’t mention the HVAC system having Bluetooth connectivity. The suspicious traffic was on the network in general.
Therefore, inspecting the IoT HVAC system itself for backdoor access planted by an attacker is the most important first step for the security analyst to take. Gaining deep visibility into the integrity of that system takes priority over investigating other possible attack vectors at this point.
In summary, when an IoT device like an HVAC system demonstrates suspicious activity, checking it for backdoor access that could allow an attacker to maintain a stealthy foothold is the top priority for mitigating the potential threat. Let me know if you have any other questions!
ECCouncil 312-49v10 certification exam practice question and answer (Q&A) dump with detail explanation and reference available free, helpful to pass the ECCouncil 312-49v10 exam and earn ECCouncil 312-49v10 certification.