Why Is DuckDuckGo’s Duck.ai Privacy Promise Under Fire From Angry Users?

How Did Duck.ai’s Location Tracking Spark a Devastating Privacy Backlash?

I’ve been watching the privacy world closely, and what happened with Duck.ai really caught my attention. Let me walk you through this whole mess and what it means for anyone who cares about keeping their data safe.

The Privacy Storm That Hit Duck.ai

Picture this: you’re using what you think is a super private AI tool, and then someone discovers it knows exactly where you live. That’s basically what happened to Duck.ai users in late June 2025.

A Reddit user called HerrNemeth dropped a bombshell when they tested Duck.ai’s privacy claims. They asked the AI about their location, and boom – it spit back their exact city and country. This wasn’t some lucky guess. The AI was clearly getting location data from somewhere, and users were not happy about it.

The post went viral fast. Other users tried the same thing and got the same scary results. One person wrote: “I was able to reproduce this. It gave the town I was in, based on the town my IP address appears to be in”.

What DuckDuckGo’s CEO Had to Say

Gabriel Weinberg, the big boss at DuckDuckGo, jumped into the Reddit thread to explain what was really going on. Here’s what he told everyone:

Duck.ai does strip away your IP address before talking to AI companies like OpenAI. But here’s the catch – they keep a rough city-level location to make local searches work better. Think weather updates or finding nearby restaurants.

Weinberg said this is the same trick they’ve used in their regular search engine for years. The idea is to give you useful local results without actually knowing your exact address.

The Real Problem With Privacy Policies

Here’s where things get tricky. Duck.ai’s privacy policy says they remove “all metadata associated with personal details” before sending your questions to AI companies. But if they’re still sharing your approximate location, is that really removing all personal data?

Many users felt misled. HerrNemeth pointed out that the privacy policy should be clearer about what location data gets shared. When you read “all personal information removed,” you probably don’t expect the AI to know what city you’re in.

Why This Reminds Me of Snapchat’s Mess

This whole thing brought back memories of Snapchat’s AI disaster in 2023. Snap’s chatbot would tell users it didn’t know their location, then turn around and accurately describe where they were. Users would ask how it knew, and the AI would claim it didn’t have that information – while clearly having access to it.

The similarity is troubling. Both cases show how AI companies can technically follow their privacy rules while still doing things that feel like privacy violations to regular users.

What DuckDuckGo Promised to Fix

To Weinberg’s credit, he didn’t try to brush this off. He made some concrete promises:

• They’ll add a setting to let users turn off even the approximate location sharing
• They’ll update their help pages to explain exactly how location data works
• They’ll consider making their privacy policy clearer about what data gets shared

The Bigger Picture for AI Privacy

This situation shows how complicated AI privacy really is. Companies want to give you useful, personalized results. But doing that often requires some of your data – even if it’s just a rough location.

Duck.ai launched as a way to use powerful AI models privately. You can chat with GPT-4, Claude, and other top AI systems without creating an account or getting tracked. That’s genuinely useful for people who want AI help without giving up their privacy.

What This Means for You

If you’re using Duck.ai or thinking about it, here’s what I’d keep in mind:

Your IP address doesn’t go to OpenAI or other AI companies. That’s good. But your approximate city location might get shared to make local results work better. Whether that bothers you depends on how private you want to be.

The good news is that DuckDuckGo seems committed to giving users more control. They’re working on letting people opt out of location sharing entirely.

The Trust Factor

What impressed me most was how quickly DuckDuckGo responded to user concerns. Instead of getting defensive, Weinberg acknowledged the problem and promised specific fixes. That’s exactly what you want to see from a company that claims to care about privacy.

This whole episode actually makes me more confident in DuckDuckGo, not less. They showed they listen to users and will change things when people raise valid concerns. Compare that to big tech companies that often ignore privacy complaints for months or years.

The privacy world is messy and complicated. But companies like DuckDuckGo are at least trying to do better. As long as they keep being transparent about what data they use and give users real choices, I think they’re heading in the right direction.