Learn the correct course of action for a project manager to take when a project’s viability is in question due to misalignment with the company’s core values, in this sample PMP certification exam question with detailed explanation.
Table of Contents
Question
A project manager works for a company that has a reputation of delivering environmentally sustainable projects. During the half- yearly review of the project, the project manager raises serious concerns with the project sponsor regarding the project’s viability and success. There are some stakeholders who oppose this project on the grounds of compromising land erosion.
What should the project manager do?
A. Request additional resources from the business unit manager due to the project’s complexity.
B. Calculate float on the project because it has severely affected the project’s major critical path.
C. Propose to close the project because it no longer fits the business values of the organization.
D. Calculate earned value (EV) because the project manager is forecasting a loss for this project in the yearly review.
Answer
C. Propose to close the project because it no longer fits the business values of the organization.
Explanation
In this scenario, the project manager has identified that the project is facing opposition from stakeholders due to concerns about compromising land erosion. This suggests the project may no longer align with the company’s reputation and core value of delivering environmentally sustainable projects.
As a project manager, it is crucial to ensure that projects not only meet their objectives but also align with the organization’s business values and strategy. If a project is found to be in conflict with these values, it is the project manager’s responsibility to escalate the issue and propose appropriate actions.
Requesting additional resources (Option A) would not address the fundamental misalignment between the project and company values. Similarly, calculating float (Option B) or earned value (Option D) are not directly relevant to resolving the ethical dilemma at hand.
The most appropriate course of action is for the project manager to propose closing the project (Option C). This demonstrates leadership and ethical decision-making by prioritizing the organization’s values over continuing a project that could potentially damage the company’s reputation. The project manager should present their findings and recommendations to the project sponsor and other key stakeholders, explaining the rationale behind proposing project closure.
By taking a proactive stance and recommending to close a misaligned project, the project manager upholds the company’s commitment to environmental sustainability and protects its reputation in the long run.
PMI PMP certification exam assessment practice question and answer (Q&A) dump including multiple choice questions (MCQ) and objective type questions, with detail explanation and reference available free, helpful to pass the PMI PMP exam and earn PMI PMP certification.