Explore the critical role of vendor master file review in fraud risk management. Learn how detecting duplicates and similar names can mitigate various risks in the procurement process.
Table of Contents
Question
From a fraud risk management perspective, which of the following best explains the need to review a vendor master file for duplicates or similar names?
A. To mitigate the risks related to the lack of segregation of duties.
B. To mitigate the risks related to invoice authorization process.
C. To mitigate the risks related to quality of data in vendor master file.
D. To mitigate the risks related to payments to unapproved bank accounts.
Answer
C. To mitigate the risks related to quality of data in vendor master file.
Explanation
Reviewing a vendor master file for duplicates or similar names is a crucial step in fraud risk management, primarily aimed at maintaining the quality and integrity of data in the vendor master file. This practice helps organizations mitigate several risks associated with vendor management and procurement processes. Here’s a detailed explanation of why this is important:
- Data Quality: The vendor master file is a critical component of an organization’s procurement system. It contains essential information about approved vendors, including their names, addresses, tax identification numbers, and bank details. Ensuring the quality of this data is paramount for effective vendor management and fraud prevention.
- Preventing Duplicate Payments: Duplicate or similar vendor names in the master file can lead to duplicate payments. This might occur when the same vendor is entered multiple times with slight variations in name or details. By identifying and consolidating these entries, organizations can prevent accidental double payments.
- Fraud Detection: Fraudsters might attempt to create fake vendor entries that closely resemble legitimate ones. By regularly reviewing the vendor master file for similar names, organizations can detect potential fraudulent entries designed to divert payments to unauthorized accounts.
- Efficient Vendor Management: Eliminating duplicates and consolidating similar entries helps in maintaining an accurate and streamlined vendor database. This efficiency is crucial for effective vendor management, contract negotiations, and spend analysis.
- Compliance and Audit Readiness: A clean vendor master file supports compliance efforts and makes audits more straightforward. It helps demonstrate that the organization has proper controls in place to manage vendor information and related risks.
- Preventing Conflicts of Interest: Similar names in the vendor master file might indicate potential conflicts of interest, such as employees setting up vendor accounts for personal gain. Regular review can help identify these risks.
While the other options presented in the question are also important aspects of fraud risk management, they don’t directly address the specific purpose of reviewing the vendor master file for duplicates or similar names:
A. Segregation of duties is a separate control measure, not directly related to vendor file review.
B. Invoice authorization process is a different stage in the procure-to-pay cycle.
D. While payments to unapproved bank accounts are a risk, this is more related to payment controls rather than the vendor master file review process.
In conclusion, reviewing the vendor master file for duplicates or similar names is primarily about maintaining data quality and integrity, which in turn supports various fraud prevention and risk management objectives in the procurement process.
IIA-CIA-Part1 certification exam practice question and answer (Q&A) dump with detail explanation and reference available free, helpful to pass the IIA-CIA-Part1 exam and earn IIA-CIA-Part1 certification.