Skip to Content

Generative AI Certificate Q&A: Ethical challenge when system create fake signature on painting

By: Author Alex Lim

Posted on  - Last updated:

Categories Exam

Question

You work on a team that’s developing a generative AI text-to-image service. Your service will specialize in creating realistic looking paintings. To train the system you have to process millions of digitized paintings. The system has learned that paintings almost always have a signature. When you test the system, it creates a fake signature on the painting. The product manager asks you to create an algorithm to remove the signatures. What might be an ethical challenge with this approach?

A. It should allow the system to create a fake form of attribution.
B. If it signs the painting, then it might have questionable intellectual property rights.
C. It’s a missed opportunity to show the artistic strength of generative AI.
D. It isn’t transparent in how the system collects its data.

Answer

B. If it signs the painting, then it might have questionable intellectual property rights.

Explanation

The answer is B. If it signs the painting, then it might have questionable intellectual property rights.

Here are some reasons why this is the case:

  • The AI system is not the original creator of the painting. The painting was created by the millions of artists whose work the AI system was trained on.
  • The AI system does not have the legal right to sign the painting. The right to sign a painting is typically granted to the artist who created it.
  • The AI system’s signature could be seen as an attempt to falsely claim ownership of the painting. This could have legal implications for the AI system and the people who use it.

By removing the signatures from the paintings, the AI system would be avoiding these ethical challenges. However, it would also be missing an opportunity to show the artistic strength of generative AI. The signatures could be seen as a way for the AI system to express its own creativity and to give credit to the artists whose work it was trained on.

Ultimately, the decision of whether or not to remove the signatures from the paintings is a complex one that should be made on a case-by-case basis. There are no easy answers, and the best approach may vary depending on the specific circumstances.

Here are some other ethical challenges that may be associated with this approach:

  • The AI system could be used to create counterfeit paintings. This could have negative implications for the art market and for the artists who create original paintings.
  • The AI system could be used to create paintings that are offensive or harmful. This could be done by using the AI system to generate paintings that depict violence, hate speech, or other forms of harmful content.
  • The AI system could be used to invade people’s privacy. This could be done by using the AI system to generate paintings that depict people without their knowledge or consent.

It is important to consider the potential ethical implications of any AI technology before using it. By doing so, we can help to ensure that AI is used for good and not for harm.

Reference

Generative AI Exam Question and Answer

The latest Generative AI Skills Initiative certificate program actual real practice exam question and answer (Q&A) dumps are available free, helpful to pass the Generative AI Skills Initiative certificate exam and earn Generative AI Skills Initiative certification.