Skip to Content

Ethical Hacking: Why Do Attackers Use Forensic Evasion to Obstruct Investigations?

What Is the Main Goal of Anti-Forensics in Cybersecurity Attacks?

Learn the main goal of forensic evasion, which is to avoid detection by investigators or monitoring tools. Discover how attackers use anti-forensic techniques to hide digital evidence, alter data, and obstruct the digital forensics process.

Question

What is the main goal of forensic evasion?

A. To crack encryption algorithms
B. To increase system performance for victims
C. To delete user profiles from the system
D. To avoid detection by investigators or monitoring tools

Answer

D. To avoid detection by investigators or monitoring tools

Explanation

Attackers use evasion to remain hidden. The primary purpose of forensic evasion, also known as anti-forensics, is to conceal malicious activities and destroy or manipulate digital evidence to impede a forensic investigation.​

The Objective of Forensic Evasion

Forensic evasion encompasses a range of techniques that attackers use to frustrate digital investigation efforts. The main goal is to prevent, delay, or mislead forensic analysis, thereby allowing the attacker to remain undetected, maintain persistence in a compromised system, and prevent investigators from understanding the scope of the attack or attributing it to them. By erasing their digital footprints, attackers make it difficult or impossible to reconstruct the timeline of an incident.​

Common Forensic Evasion Techniques

Attackers employ several methods to achieve their goal of evading detection:​

  • Data Hiding: This involves concealing data to prevent its discovery. Techniques include encryption, which scrambles data to make it unreadable, and steganography, which hides data within other innocent-looking files like images or audio tracks.​
  • Artifact Wiping: This is the process of eliminating evidence of an attacker’s presence. Examples include clearing system logs, using file-shredding utilities to securely delete malicious tools, and altering file timestamps (a technique known as “timestomping”) to confuse the timeline of events.​
  • Obfuscation: Attackers may obfuscate their activities or malware to make analysis more difficult. This can involve writing code that is intentionally confusing or using packing and virtualization detection to prevent the malware from running in a sandbox environment where it could be analyzed.​

Analysis of Incorrect Options

A. To crack encryption algorithms: Forensic evasion is about using techniques, including encryption, to hide data, not about breaking encryption created by others. The goal is to make evidence inaccessible, not to decrypt external data.​

B. To increase system performance for victims: Malicious activities and the tools used for forensic evasion typically consume additional system resources, which can degrade performance rather than improve it. An attacker’s priority is stealth, not optimizing the victim’s system.​

C. To delete user profiles from the system: While deleting files is a form of artifact wiping, deleting an entire user profile is a very specific and often noisy action that could easily alert administrators to a compromise. The main goal is much broader: to evade any form of detection, not just to perform one specific destructive act.​

Ethical Hacking: Meterpreter, DNS & ICMP Attacks certification exam assessment practice question and answer (Q&A) dump including multiple choice questions (MCQ) and objective type questions, with detail explanation and reference available free, helpful to pass the Ethical Hacking: Meterpreter, DNS & ICMP Attacks exam and earn Ethical Hacking: Meterpreter, DNS & ICMP Attacks certificate.