Discover the primary considerations for forensic investigators like Alex to ensure a forensically sound data acquisition from a suspect’s large drive, following best practices in digital forensics.
Table of Contents
Question
Forensic Investigator Alex has to collect data from a suspect’s large drive in a time-bound investigation. The court would allow him to retain the original drive. Considering these factors, what should be Alex’s primary considerations to ensure a forensically sound data acquisition?
A. Using Microsoft disk compression tools and validating the data acquisition process
B. Sanitizing the target media using the (German) VSITR method and acquiring volatile data
C. Enabling write protection on the evidence media and prioritizing data acquisition based on evidentiary value
D. Utilizing lossless compression tools and creating a bit-stream copy using a reliable acquisition tool
Answer
C. Enabling write protection on the evidence media and prioritizing data acquisition based on evidentiary value
Explanation
In digital forensics, ensuring a forensically sound data acquisition process is crucial to maintaining the integrity and admissibility of the evidence. Forensic Investigator Alex should consider the following primary steps:
- Enable Write Protection: Write protection on the evidence media prevents any alterations to the original data. This step is fundamental in maintaining the integrity of the evidence by ensuring that no new data is written, and existing data is not modified during the acquisition process.
- Prioritize Data Acquisition: In a time-bound investigation, it is essential to prioritize the acquisition of data based on its evidentiary value. This means focusing first on the most critical data that could provide immediate insights or crucial evidence for the case.
- Use Forensically Sound Tools: Employing reliable and validated forensic acquisition tools ensures that the data is copied accurately without any loss or alteration. These tools are designed to create bit-stream copies, which are exact replicas of the original media, including all files, folders, and even deleted or hidden data.
Why Other Options Are Less Suitable:
- Option A: Using Microsoft disk compression tools may alter the data format, potentially impacting the integrity of the evidence. Validating the data acquisition process is essential but should not compromise data integrity through compression.
- Option B: Sanitizing the target media using the (German) VSITR method is a method for securely erasing data from media, which is not relevant to data acquisition. Acquiring volatile data is important but secondary to securing the non-volatile evidence first.
- Option D: Utilizing lossless compression tools might help in saving storage space but could introduce complexities and potential risks in data integrity. Creating a bit-stream copy is correct, but this alone does not address write protection or prioritization of evidentiary data.
By focusing on these key considerations, Alex can ensure a forensically sound data acquisition process that upholds the integrity and admissibility of the digital evidence in court.
ECCouncil 312-49v10 certification exam practice question and answer (Q&A) dump with detail explanation and reference available free, helpful to pass the ECCouncil 312-49v10 exam and earn ECCouncil 312-49v10 certification.