Discover expert strategies for addressing unmeasured smoking confounding in occupational health research when data is lacking. Learn why traditional adjustment fails and advanced alternatives succeed.
Table of Contents
Question
In a study of risk of death in a occupational cohort of miners, smoking is considered a potential confounder, however information on smoking is lacking. Which method can be used to handle it?
A. Restriction
B. Statistical adjustment
C. None of the above
Answer
C. None of the above
Explanation
Without information on smoking, neither restriction nor statistical adjustment can be used to handle this potential confounder.
In occupational cohort studies where smoking data is unavailable, traditional methods like restriction or statistical adjustment become ineffective. Confounding by smoking must be addressed through alternative approaches validated in epidemiological research.
Why Standard Methods Fail
Restriction (Option A): Requires excluding participants based on smoking status, which is impossible without smoking data.
Statistical Adjustment (Option B): Requires measured smoking variables for regression or stratification.
Valid Alternatives When Smoking Data Is Missing
- Negative Control Outcomes: Use outcomes unrelated to the exposure but linked to smoking (e.g., COPD) to detect confounding.
- External Validation Samples: Integrate supplementary smoking data from surveys or cohorts to calibrate estimates.
- Multiple Imputation: Impute missing confounders using study patterns or external data.
- Propensity Score Calibration: Adjust analyses using proxy variables correlated with smoking.
Example from Research
In uranium miner studies, researchers used COPD deaths as a negative control to confirm no radon-smoking confounding. Without smoking data, such methods are critical to avoid biased hazard ratios.
When smoking data is entirely missing, neither restriction nor statistical adjustment works. Advanced techniques like negative controls or external data integration are essential. Thus, C (None of the above) is correct.
This answer synthesizes methodologies from occupational epidemiology, emphasizing practical solutions for real-world data challenges. For certification exams, understanding these nuances demonstrates mastery of confounding control in observational studies.
Data Science with Real World Data in Pharma certification exam assessment practice question and answer (Q&A) dump including multiple choice questions (MCQ) and objective type questions, with detail explanation and reference available free, helpful to pass the Data Science with Real World Data in Pharma exam and earn Data Science with Real World Data in Pharma certification.