Table of Contents
How Does Proof-of-Work’s Energy Use Compare to Proof-of-Stake and Other Consensus Mechanisms?
Explore the key differences between blockchain consensus mechanisms and their energy trade-offs. Understand why Proof-of-Work (PoW) is known for its high energy consumption compared to more efficient alternatives like Proof-of-Stake (PoS) and Delegated Proof-of-Stake (DPoS).
Question
Differentiate between various consensus mechanisms and their trade-offs. Which consensus mechanism is known for its high energy consumption?
A. Delegated proof-of-stake
B. Proof-of-work
C. Proof-of-stake
D. Practical Byzantine Fault Tolerance (PBFT)
Answer
B. Proof-of-work
Explanation
Proof-of-work is notorious for its high energy consumption due to the computational power required for mining.
Proof-of-Work (PoW) is a consensus mechanism that requires network participants, or “miners,” to expend significant computational energy to solve complex mathematical puzzles. This process is essential for validating transactions and adding new blocks to the blockchain. The immense and continuous computational race among miners is the reason for PoW’s notoriously high energy consumption. Networks like Bitcoin, which use PoW, have an annual energy consumption comparable to that of entire countries.
Analysis of Incorrect Options
A. Delegated Proof-of-Stake (DPoS): This mechanism is a low-energy alternative to PoW. In DPoS, network participants vote for a limited number of “delegates” who are responsible for validating transactions. Since it relies on a voting system rather than a computational competition, its energy footprint is minimal.
C. Proof-of-Stake (PoS): PoS was specifically designed to be a more energy-efficient alternative to PoW. Instead of relying on computational power, PoS selects validators based on the amount of cryptocurrency they “stake” as collateral. The transition of the Ethereum network from PoW to PoS demonstrated this difference dramatically, cutting its energy use by an estimated 99.95%.
D. Practical Byzantine Fault Tolerance (PBFT): This is a consensus mechanism that enables a distributed system to reach an agreement even if some nodes are malicious. It relies on communication and voting among a set of known validators and does not involve the energy-intensive mining process characteristic of PoW, making it far more energy-efficient.
Blockchain Foundations & Smart Contracts certification exam assessment practice question and answer (Q&A) dump including multiple choice questions (MCQ) and objective type questions, with detail explanation and reference available free, helpful to pass the Blockchain Foundations & Smart Contracts exam and earn Blockchain Foundations & Smart Contracts certificate.