Learn whether the Tree-of-Thought (ToT) approach achieved a 74% success rate in the Game of 24 compared to Chain-of-Thought’s 4%, based on recent AI advancements in problem-solving techniques.
Table of Contents
Question
According to researchers, the Tree-of-Thought (ToT) approach achieved a 74% success rate in the Game of 24, while Chain-of-Thought only achieved 4%.
A. True
B. False
Answer
A. True
Explanation
According to multiple research sources, the Tree-of-Thought (ToT) prompting framework significantly outperformed the Chain-of-Thought (CoT) approach in solving the Game of 24. Specifically, ToT achieved a 74% success rate, while CoT only managed a 4% success rate. This stark difference underscores ToT’s enhanced problem-solving capabilities, which involve exploring multiple reasoning paths and self-evaluating solutions at each step, as opposed to CoT’s linear reasoning process.
The Game of 24 is a mathematical reasoning task where players use four numbers and basic arithmetic operations to reach the value of 24. ToT’s superior performance is attributed to its ability to branch out into multiple solution paths, evaluate them dynamically, and backtrack when necessary, mimicking human-like strategic exploration and decision-making.
IBMSkillsNetwork Prompt Engineering for Everyone AI0117EN Module 4 Advanced Techniques certification exam assessment practice question and answer (Q&A) dump including multiple choice questions (MCQ) and objective type questions, with detail explanation and reference available free, helpful to pass the IBMSkillsNetwork Prompt Engineering for Everyone AI0117EN exam and earn IBMSkillsNetwork Prompt Engineering for Everyone AI0117EN certification.