Explore the optimal project delivery approach for implementing new tax laws in accounting systems. Learn why a predictive method is crucial when facing clear requirements and potential fines.
Table of Contents
Question
Recently, the government published a new tax law giving companies one year to implement the changes. A project was initiated to change the accounting system.
Which delivery approach is most suitable in this context?
A. Predictive, because the requirements are clearly defined up-front.
B. Adaptive, because the changes have never been implemented before.
C. Predictive, because of the high risk that the company can be fined.
D. Adaptive, because the government will provide constant feedback.
Answer
The most suitable delivery approach for this project is:
A. Predictive, because the requirements are clearly defined up-front.
Explanation
In this scenario, a predictive delivery approach is the most appropriate choice for implementing the new tax law changes in the accounting system. Here’s why:
- Clear Requirements: The government has published a new tax law, which provides a clear set of requirements that need to be implemented. This clarity in requirements is a key characteristic that favors a predictive approach.
- Fixed Deadline: The companies have been given one year to implement the changes. This fixed timeframe allows for better planning and scheduling, which aligns well with predictive methodologies.
- Compliance Nature: Tax laws are typically precise and leave little room for interpretation or gradual evolution. This precision fits well with predictive approaches that rely on upfront planning and execution.
- Risk Management: While option C mentions the risk of fines, which is indeed a concern, it’s not the primary reason for choosing a predictive approach. However, the predictive approach does allow for better risk management in this high-stakes situation.
- Minimal Feedback Loop: Unlike what option D suggests, it’s unlikely that the government will provide constant feedback during the implementation process. Tax laws are usually implemented as-is, without iterative changes.
- Nature of the Change: Although the changes may be new to the company (as suggested in option B), this doesn’t necessarily require an adaptive approach. The newness of a task doesn’t always dictate the need for adaptivity, especially when requirements are clear.
A predictive approach, such as the traditional waterfall method, would allow the project team to:
- Clearly define the scope based on the new tax law
- Create a detailed project plan with milestones leading up to the one-year deadline
- Allocate resources effectively
- Implement thorough testing to ensure compliance
- Manage risks associated with non-compliance
While adaptive approaches like Agile can be beneficial in many scenarios, they are more suited to projects where requirements are likely to change or evolve, or where continuous stakeholder feedback is necessary and beneficial. In this case, with clear, fixed requirements and a set deadline, a predictive approach is more suitable for ensuring timely and accurate implementation of the new tax law in the accounting system.
PMI CAPM certification exam practice question and answer (Q&A) dump with detail explanation and reference available free, helpful to pass the PMI CAPM exam and earn PMI CAPM certification.