Learn the correct weighted calculation method for translating design factor values into governance and management priorities according to the ISACA COBIT 2019 framework and exam.
Table of Contents
Question
Which of the following should be used when translating design factor values into governance and management priorities?
A. Weighted average
B. Matrix calculation
C. Weighted calculation
D. Pareto analysis
Answer
C. Weighted calculation
Explanation
In COBIT 2019, a weighted calculation should be used when translating design factor values into governance and management priorities. The weighted calculation involves assigning relative importance weights to each design factor, then multiplying the score or value for each factor by its weight. The weighted scores are then totaled to determine the overall priorities.
This weighted approach allows the most important design factors, based on the specific context and needs of the enterprise, to be given greater influence on the resulting priorities. The other incorrect options like averages or Pareto analysis would not factor in the relative importance of different design factors in determining priorities.
So in summary, the COBIT 2019 framework specifies using a weighted calculation method to translate the values of design factors into ultimate governance and management priorities that reflect each factor’s significance. This allows the priorities to be customized based on what matters most to each unique enterprise.
ISACA COBIT 2019 Design and Implementation certification exam assessment practice question and answer (Q&A) dump including multiple choice questions (MCQ) and objective type questions, with detail explanation and reference available free, helpful to pass the ISACA COBIT 2019 Design and Implementation exam and earn ISACA COBIT 2019 Design and Implementation certification.